Git: Difference between revisions
From Andreida
No edit summary |
|||
Line 173: | Line 173: | ||
If it does not work, first thing to try: just try it again. At least once that worked for me. |
If it does not work, first thing to try: just try it again. At least once that worked for me. |
||
== Stories == |
|||
=== Merge after pull === |
|||
* I pull and have a clean status. |
|||
* Git fan who uses git since years does a push. |
|||
* I pull and have to merge |
|||
* Git fan: "The reason you don't understand why you have to merge is, that you don't understand how git works internally." |
|||
=== We don't need no client/server source management in this project === |
|||
* git developer working since weeks on a ticket |
|||
* asked where the code is: |
|||
* "we only push when the code is done" |
Revision as of 21:05, 13 August 2020
Basics
- a working directory is using a branch (might be master)
- changes to files are NOT linked to a branch
- "git add" is NOT linked to a branch, but says, I will later commit these files to my local repository
- "git commit"+branch IS linked to a branch and adds the changes to the local repository in the given branch
- "git push" uploads a branch to another repository (perhaps to another computer)
- "git fetch" gets update/status information about the complete repository
- "git pull" downlads updates for the current branch from another repository (perhaps from another computer)
Commands
Basic commands
- get a repository
- create one
git init
- get one
git clone git://github.com/schacon/grit.git
- look at it
git status
- add a new file
git add <new file>
- commit changes to your local repository
- mark for send and send in one command
git commit -a -m 'committing all changed files'
- do mark and send in two steps
- mark for the commit
- do mark and send in two steps
git add <file>
- commit
git commit -m 'message'
- send data to server
- check, what you would send to the server
git push -n
- show changes which will be sent to the server
git diff <hash...hash_from-push-n>
- send commits to server, if you started the repository with clone
git push
- delete a branch:
git branch -d <branch> git push origin :<branch>
Branches
- new branch
git branch <name> | git checkout -b <name>
- switch to branch
git checkout <name>
- merge branch/hotfix to the master
git checkout master git merge <name> | git merge origin/<name> --no-ff
- show existing branches (note the * marking the current one)
git branch
- not merged yet
git branch --no-merge
- revert a merge which has been done with --no-ff
git revert -m 1 hash_of_merge_commit
- not pushed yet:
git log origin/master..master
- list of changes that will be merged into current branch.
git log ..otherbranch
- diff from common ancestor (merge base) to the head of what will be merged. Note the three dots.
git diff ...otherbranch
- not pushed yet
git log --branches --not --remotes
Easier handling
gui
Use SourceTree.
auto complete
I have currently problems with this auto complete, if you have problems too, just comment it or remove it.
- get the file
wget https://raw.github.com/git/git/master/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash
- source it (in your .bashrc)
. git-completion.bash
- try it (inside a git directory)
git co <tab><tab>
alias
put these into your .bashrc
# simple history
alias gitree='git log --pretty=format:"%h - %an, %ar : %s" --graph'
# colors
Green="\[\033[0;32m\]"
Blue="\[\033[0;34m\]"
Yellow="\[\033[01;33m\]"
Color_Off="\[\033[0m\]"
# better histories, last 30, all
alias gitlol='git log --graph --decorate --pretty=format:"%Cgreen%h %Cred%ad%C(Yellow)%d %Cblue%an %Creset%s" --abbrev-commit --date=short -30'
alias gitlola='git log --graph --decorate --pretty=format:"%Cgreen%h %Cred%ad%C(Yellow)%d %Cblue%an %Creset%s" --abbrev-commit --date=short --all'
# prompt shall show info about the git branch
if [ -f /etc/bash_completion.d/git ]; then
. /etc/bash_completion.d/git
GIT_PS1_SHOWDIRTYSTATE=true
PS1=$Color_Off'[\t \u@\h]'$Color_Off' \w'$Blue'$(__git_ps1 " {%s}")'$Color_Off' \$ '$Color_Off
else
PS1=$Color_Off'[\t \u@\h]'$Color_Off' \w \$ '$Color_Off
fi
# diff via log or diff
alias gitdifflog='function git_log() { git log --graph --decorate --pretty=format:"%Cgreen%h %Cred%ad%C(Yellow)%d %Cblue%an %Creset%s" --abbrev-commit ..$1; };git_log'
alias gitdiff='function git_diff() { git diff --pretty=format:"%Cgreen%h %Cred%ad%C(Yellow)%d %Cblue%an %Creset%s" ...$1; };git_diff'
call:
gitdifflog OtherBranch1
gitdiff OtherBranch1
Tutorials / Manuals
* http://git-scm.com/book
.gitconfig
[color] branch = auto diff = auto status = auto [color "branch"] current = yellow reverse local = yellow remote = green [color "diff"] meta = black bold frag = magenta bold old = red bold new = green bold [color "status"] added = yellow changed = green untracked = cyan
special commands
git reset
git reset will move your merge/add/commit actions to a point in history, undo them:
git reset --soft HEAD~1 // committed things are now only added git reset --mixed HEAD~1 // committed things are not added anymore git reset --merge // all changes from "git merge" are removed git reset --hard // all changes since last push are removed
remote
show info about the remote repository:
git remote show origin
save user/password
If you are asked for user/password each time you use "git push" and you have no problem having the credentials stored in a not very safe way locally:
git config credential.helper store git push git push
The first "git push" will again ask for user/password, the second one should not need it any longer.
change commit message with SourceTree
- select commit BEFORE the one you want to change
- right click the selected commit
- rebase children of ... interactively
- select the commit you want to change
- "Edit Message"
- Ok
- Ok
If it does not work, first thing to try: just try it again. At least once that worked for me.
Stories
Merge after pull
- I pull and have a clean status.
- Git fan who uses git since years does a push.
- I pull and have to merge
- Git fan: "The reason you don't understand why you have to merge is, that you don't understand how git works internally."
We don't need no client/server source management in this project
- git developer working since weeks on a ticket
- asked where the code is:
- "we only push when the code is done"